Obviously, where older research is seminal or where aspects of the methodology rely upon it, then it is perfectly appropriate for authors to cite some older papers. Your review should ultimately help the author improve their article. Is the paper's premise interesting and important? Certain patterns of good reporting need to be followed by the author: Discussion should always, at some point, gather all the information together into a single whole. A poor abstract can then lose the reader's interest and undo the benefit of an effective title - whilst the paper's abstract may appear in search results, the potential reader may go no further. 1 Recommendation 18th Jun, 2018 Antonio Pirisi Agris Sardegna Hi, it depends from the Journal but normally you can wait more days. "Number your comments!!!" I did not receive any intimation from the editorial office about my manuscript not meeting the journal's guidelines. Ritardo Rogito Per Colpa Banca, Hey what did the blank stage end up meaning ? During these checks you should keep in mind best practice: If the research fails to reach relevant best practice standards, it's usual to recommend rejection. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. However, some journals also have longer processing time, e.g., IEEE journals. My paper was published in a journal in 2021 october. The. However, this doesn't give reviewers permission to 'backstab' the author. Now that you have completed your preparations, you're ready to spend an hour or so reading carefully through the manuscript. Editors will make sure that the text is at a high standard before publication. If the author is disagreeing significantly with the current academic consensus, do they have a substantial case? Are the authors presenting findings that challenge current thinking? In such a scenario, the editorial board would send the manuscript to other peer reviewers or assign a different section editor. Drug Designing is an Open Access - Open Access using online manuscript submission, review and tracking systems of Longdom Publishing for quality and quick review processing. Please share with the community how many days the entire process took by the editor's office. Government contractor companies in dc 3 . Currently there are several therapeutic agents in more than 1000 clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease . Lol one paper from our lab went 1.5 years before publication. Scholarly interest in the experience of dehumanization, the perception that one is being dehumanized, has increased significantly in recent years, yet the construct lacks a validated measurement. Based on the Advanced Functional Materials Review Speed Feedback System, it takes publisher 97.00 days to publish manuscript from receiving manuscript. Duration of manuscript handling phases; Duration first review round: 0.7 mnths: compare : Total handling time accepted manuscripts: 1.0 mnths: compare : Decision time immediate rejection: 11 days: compare : Characteristics of peer review process; Average number of review reports: 2.3: compare : Average number of review rounds: 1.7 . Chapter one is called The Idea of the World because it reflects the meaning of the efforts of the ancient's philosophers-geographers to know the shape and size of the Earth, discover its position in space, and find out what is around them. [CDATA[// >